| Questions: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |

(a) First, the wire has a uniform linear charge density λ = Q/L. Next, we consider a small portion of the wire, dx, located at a distance x from the left end of the wire having charge dq. These infinitesimals are related by
dq = λdx = (Q/L)dx .
Assuming that the charge on the wire is positive, the electric field at x = L + a due to dq, dE, is directed to the right. Using Coulomb's Law, dE is given by
dE = kdq r/r3 .
Here r = i(L+a-x) and r = L+a-x. Thus
dE = ikdq/r2 = i(kQ/L)dx/(L+a-x)2 .
Integrating over the entire length of the wire, we get the total electric
field to be
| E | = ò0L dE |
| = i(kQ/L) ò0L dx/(L+a-x)2 | |
| = i(kQ/L){1/(L+a-x) |0L} | |
| = i(kQ/L){1/a - 1/(L+a)} | |
| = i(kQ/a2)(a / L+a) |
In the limit a >> L, a/(L+a) ® 1, and
E = i(kQ/a2) .
At a great distance from the wire, the wire produces a field like that of a point charge.
(b) Here we are given the linear charge density λ(x). Next, we consider a small portion of the wire, dx, located at a distance x from the left end of the wire having charge dq. These infinitesimals are related by
dq = λ(x)dx = (2Q/L2) xdx .
Assuming that the charge on the wire is positive, the electric field at x = L + a due to dq, dE, is directed to the right. Using Coulomb's Law, dE is given by
dE = ikdq/r2 = i(2Q/L2) dx {x/(L+a-x)2} .
Integrating over the entire length of the wire, we get the total electric
field to be
| E | = ò0L dE |
| = i(2Q/L2) ò0L dx{x/(L+a-x)2} | |
| = i(2Q/L2){ (L+a)/(L+a-x) + ln(L + a - x) |0L} | |
| = i(2Q/L2){L/a - ln(l + L/a)} |
In the limit a >> L, {L/a - ln(1 + L/a)} ® ½(L/a)2, and
E = i(kQ/a2) .
At a great distance from the wire, the wire produces a field like that of a point charge.

First, the wire has a uniform linear charge density λ = Q/L. Next, we consider a small portion of the wire, dx, located at a distance x from the left end of the wire having charge dq. These infinitesimals are related by
dq = λdx = (Q/L)dx .
Assuming that the charge on the wire is positive, the electric field at r points away from dq. Using Coulomb's Law, dE is given by
dE = kdq r/r3 .
Here r = −ix + ja and r = (x2 + a2)½. Thus
dE = [−ix + ja] (kQ/L)dx/[x2 + a2]3/2 .
Integrating over the entire length of the wire, we get the total electric
field to be
| E | = ò-½L½L dE |
| = (kQ/L) {-iò-½L½L dx x/[a2 + x2]3/2 + jò-½L½L dx a/[a2 + x2]3/2} | |
| = (kQ/L){0 + j x / a[a2+x2]½ |-½L½L } | |
| = j (kQ/L){½L / a[a2+¼L2]½ - (-½L) / a[a2+¼L2]½} | |
| = j (kQ/L){2L / a[4a2+L2]½ } | |
| = j (2kQ / La){1 / [1+4(a/L)2]½ } |
In the limit L >> a, 1 / [1+4(a/L)2]½® 1, and
E = i(2kQ/La) = i(2kλ/a) .
Note that there is no i component to the electric field as can be seen from the symmetry of the problem.

First, each wire has a uniform linear charge density λ = Q/L. Next, we consider a small portion of one wire, dx, located at a distance x from the midpoint of the two wires having charge dq. These infinitesimals are related by
dq = λdx = (Q/L)dx .
Assuming that the charge on the wire is positive, the electric field at r points away from dq. Using Coulomb's Law, dE is given by
dE = kdq r/r3 .
Here r = −ix + jh and r = (x2 + h2)½. Thus
dE = [−ix + jh](kQ/L)dx/[h2 + x2]3/2 .
The symmetry of the problem can help reduce the amount of work we have
to do. First the i components from each wire cancel, so we
need only consider the j contributions. Second the j
contributions must be the same. As a result we need only integrate over
the length of would wire and double the result. We find that the total
electric field is
| E | = 2ò½aL+½a dEy |
| = j (2kQ/L) { ò½aL+½a h/[h2 + x2]3/2 } | |
| = j (2kQ/L){ x / h[h2+x2]½ |½aL+½a } | |
| = j (2kQ/L){(L+½a) / h[h2+(L+½a)2]½ - (½a) / h[h2+¼a2]½} |
In the limit h >> L and h >> a, (L+½a) / h[h2+(L+½a)2]½− (½a) / h[h2+¼a2]½® L/h2, and
E = i(2kQ/h2) .
This is same result as from a single point of charge 2Q.

We consider a small portion of the wire, dS, located at an angle θ, having charge dq. These infinitesimals are related by
dq = λdS = λRdθ .
Assuming that the charge on the wire is positive, the electric field at P points away from dq. Using Coulomb's Law, dE is given by
dE = kdq r/r3 .
Here r = −iRcos(θ) − jRsin(θ) and r = R. Thus
dE = [−iRcos(θ) − jRsin(θ)]kλRdθ/R3 = [−icos(θ) − jsin(θ)] kλdθ/R .
Integrating over the entire angular length of the wire, we get the total
electric field to be
| E | = ò0π dE |
| = -(kλ/R) { iò0πcos(θ)dθ + jò0πsin(θ)dθ } | |
| = -(kλ/R){ isin(θ)|0p- jcos(θ)|0π } | |
| = -(kλ/R){0 − 2j} | |
| = -j(2kλ/R) |
Of course, we could have used the symmetry of the problem to predict that the i component had to be zero.

The magnitude of the electric field from each wire is the same and is directed as shown in the diagram. The net electric field will clearly be downwards, the i contributions will cancel. Using trigonometry, the centre point is distance x = ½Ltan(30°) = L / 2Ö3 from each wire.
Using the result of Question 2,
Ewire = (2kQ / Lx){1 / [1+4(x/L)2]½ } = 6kQ/L2 .
The total electric field is
Enet = -j [Ewire + 2Ewirecos(60°)] = - j 2Ewire = - j 12kQ/L2 .
(a) The charge contained is Q = A.
(b) A diagram let's us see why the net field is only in the i directions. Consider identical small pieces of charge which are diametrically opposed and the electric field each produces at x = ±a.

If the pieces have the same charge, the electric fields they produce will have the same magnitude. Looking at the above diagram, we see that the j components will cancel.
(c) From part (b) we have seen that the E is in the ±i direction. Therefore no fields pass through the sides of the pillbox as shown in the diagram below.

(d) By symmetry, the electric fields must have the same magnitude on either side of the plate, E(-a) = E(a).
(e)Gauss' Law states that the total flux of the electric field through all sides of the pillbox is equal to the enclosed charge divided by ε0, or
òE • ndA = Qenclosed/ε0, (1)
where n is the outward-looking normal on each side of the surface. From part (a) we know Qenclosed = A. The pillbox has two ends and one side, so that the integral has three parts
òE • ndA = òleftE • nleftdA + òsideE • nsidedA + òrightE • nrightdA .
Examining the diagram below, we see that E • nside = 0 since the vectors are at right angles. Similarly, E • nleft = E • nright = E since the vectors are parallel.

Thus equation (1) reduces to
2E òend dA = ΣA/ε0 . (2)
Since E is constant at the ends, it was taken out side the integral. The integral itself then reduces to the surface area of the end of the pillbox,
2EA = ΣA/ε0 .
Hence the field due to an infinitely large plate is E = Σ / 2ε0. This result is good for real plates if one is much closer to the plate than the diameter of the plate.
(a) Symmetry indicates that the electric field only has an i component and no j component. This means that Gauss' Law,
òE • ndA = Qenclosed/ε0 ,
reduces to
2 E(a) A = Qenclosed/ε0 .
(b) The electric field at x = 0 is zero since the charge is distributed symmetrically about the y-axis. The electric field from a piece of charge on one side will exactly cancel with the field from a piece of charge on the other side.
(c) We need to find the charge inside the pillbox shown in the diagram below.

The charge inside is given by
Qenclosed = ρ0V = ρ0(2a)A = 2aAρ0 .
Thus Gauss' Law yields,
2 E(a) A = 2aAρ0/ε0 .
Thus the electric field is
E(a) = ρ0a/ε0 .
(d) We need to find the charge inside the pillbox shown in the diagram below.

The charge inside is given by
Qenclosed = ρ0V = ρ0Ad ,
since the charge is confined to -½d £ x £ ½d.
Thus Gauss' Law yields,
2 E(a) A = Adρ0/ρ0.
Thus the electric field is E(a) = ρ0d / 2ε0 .
(e) The electric field as a function of a looks like


The amount of flux that passes through the cylinder is given by
òE • ndA = òleftE • nleftdA + òsideE • nsidedA + òrightE • nrightdA .
Examining the diagram above, we see that E • nside = E(a) since the vectors are parallel. Similarly, E • nleft = E • nright = 0 since the vectors are at right angles. So there is no flux through the ends of the "gaussian cylinder".
(b) Only a length L of the wire is inside the "gaussian cylinder", so Qenclosed = λL .
(c) Gauss' Law states that the total flux of the electric field through all sides of the pillbox is equal to the enclosed charge divided by ε0, or
òE • ndA = Qenclosed/ε0 ,
where n is the outward-looking normal on each side of the surface. From parts (a) and (b), we know that this reduces to
òside E(a)dA = λL/ε0 .
Since E(a) is a constant for a given radius a, it may be taken outside the integral,
E(a) òside dA = λL/ε0 ,
and we are left with an integral for the surface area of the side of the "gaussian cylinder" which is A = 2πaL. Thus we have
E(a) 2πaL = λL/ε0 .
Solving for the electric field yields
E(a) = λ / 2pe0a .
For cases of cylindrical symmetry, Gauss' Law
òE • ndA = Qenclosed/ε0 ,
reduces to the much simpler
E(a) 2πaL = Qenclosed/ε0 ,
where a is the radius of the "gaussian cylinder" and L is its length.
(a) We draw an end view of the shell and "gaussian cylinder".

We see that there is no charge inside the "gaussian cylinder", so Qenclosed = 0.
(b) Thus we find that the electric field for a < R is 0. There is no electric inside the shell.
(c) Considering the case of a > R, we have the following diagram.

The "gaussian cylinder" encircles a length L of the shell, so Qenclosed = Σ2πRL.
(d) Thus Gauss' Law reduces to
E(a) 2πaL = Σ2πRL / ε0 ,
and hence the electric field is
E(a) = ΣR / aε0 ,
for a > R.
(e) The electric field as a function of a looks like

Note the jump in the electric field at the shell.
(a) The charge is arranged symmetrically about the centre, so the electric field from a piece of charge on one side is cancelled by the electric field from the diametrically opposed piece of charge on the other side. Thus the electric field is zero at the centre.
(b) We sketch the problem

The "gaussian sphere" contains only a portion of the total charge given by
Qenclosed = Q Vgauss/Vsphere = Q (4πa3/3 / 4πR3/3) = Q(a/R)3 .
(c) Gauss' Law is stated
òE • ndA = Qenclosed/ε0 ,
where n is the outward looking normal. For cases of spherical symmetry, as we have here, E and n are parallel and E • n = E(a). The electric field at the surface, E(a), is a constant because of the spherical charge distribution and may be taken outside the integral. We determined Qenclosed in part (b), thus we have
E(a) ò dA = (Q/ε0)(a/R)3 .
The integral is simply the surface area of the "gaussian sphere", hence we have
E(a) 4πa2 = (Q/ε0)(a/R)3 .
Thus the electric field is
E(a) = Qa / 4pe0R3 ,
for 0 £ a £ R.
(d) We sketch the "gaussian sphere" and see that it contains the entire sphere therefore Qenclosed = Q.

(e) Gauss' Law reduces to
E(a) 4πa2 = Q/ε0 ,
and the electric field is
E(a) = Q / 4pe0a2 ,
for a ³ R.
(f) The electric field looks like

(a) First we sketch the "gaussian sphere" in each case.
(i) Here we see that there is no charge inside the "gaussian sphere", so Qenclosed = 0.
(ii) Here there is only a portion of the total charge inside the "gaussian sphere" given by the ratio of volumes

(iii) Here the entire shell is enclosed, so Qenclosed = Q.
(b) In cases of spherical symmetry, Gauss' Law
òE • ndA = Qenclosed/ε0 ,
reduces to
E(a) 4πa2 = Qenclosed / ε0 .
For our three cases, we have
(i) For a £ R,
E(a) 4πa2 = 0 .
Thus E(a) = 0.
(ii) For R £ a £ 2R,
E(a) 4πa2 = Q(a3-R3)/(7ε0R3) .
Thus E(a) = (Q/4pe0R3)(a3-R3)/(7a2).
(iii) For a £ 2R,
E(a) 4πa2 = Q/ε0 .
Thus E(a) = Q/4pe0a2.
(c) The electric field looks like


For cases of spherical symmetry, Gauss' Law
òE • ndA = Qenclosed/ε0 ,
reduces to
E(a) 4πa2 = Qenclosed/ε0 .
Here we have two cases as shown in the diagram below: (i) 0 £ a £ R and (ii) a ³ R.

(i) For 0 £ a £ R, Qenclosed = 0. Hence the electric field is zero.
(ii) For a ³ R, the total shell is enclosed so Qenclosed = Q. We are not given Q but rather the charge density so
Qenclosed = -Σ 4πR2 .
Thus Gauss' Law is
E(a) 4πa2 = -Σ 4πR2 / ε0 .
Hence the electric field is
E(a) = -(Σ/ε0)(R/a)2 .
Thus the electric field looks like

As long as the charge distribution is symmetrical, we can find the electric field from Gauss' Law. Gauss' Law says that E(a) depends only on the total charge enclosed and thus is independent of how that charge is distributed throughout the material. Hence we cannot distinguish between a sphere with all its charge on the surface and a sphere with the charge smeared throughout the sphere.
Questions?mike.coombes@kwantlen.ca