| Questions: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |

(a) First, the wire has a uniform linear charge density λ = Q/L. Next, we consider a small portion of the wire, dx, located at a distance x from the left end of the wire having charge dq. These infinitesimals are related by
dq = λdx = (Q/L)dx .
Assuming that the charge on the wire is positive, the electric field at x = L + a due to dq, dE, is directed to the right. Using Coulomb's Law, dE is given by
dE = kdq r/r3 .
Here r = i(L+a-x) and r = L+a-x. Thus
dE = ikdq/r2 = i(kQ/L)dx/(L+a-x)2 .
Integrating over the entire length of the wire, we get the
total
electric field to be
| E | = ∫0L dE |
| = i(kQ/L) ∫0L dx/(L+a-x)2 | |
| = i(kQ/L){1/(L+a-x) |0L} | |
| = i(kQ/L){1/a - 1/(L+a)} | |
| = i(kQ/a2)(a / L+a) |
In the limit a >> L, a/(L+a) ® 1, and
E = i(kQ/a2) .
At a great distance from the wire, the wire produces a field like that of a point charge.
(b) Here we are given the linear charge density λ(x). Next, we consider a small portion of the wire, dx, located at a distance x from the left end of the wire having charge dq. These infinitesimals are related by
dq = λ(x)dx = (2Q/L2) xdx .
Assuming that the charge on the wire is positive, the electric field at x = L + a due to dq, dE, is directed to the right. Using Coulomb's Law, dE is given by
dE = ikdq/r2 = i(2Q/L2) dx {x/(L+a-x)2} .
Integrating over the entire length of the wire, we get the
total
electric field to be
| E | = ∫0L dE |
| = i(2Q/L2) ∫0L dx{x/(L+a-x)2} | |
| = i(2Q/L2){ (L+a)/(L+a-x) + ln(L + a - x) |0L} | |
| = i(2Q/L2){L/a - ln(l + L/a)} |
In the limit a >> L, {L/a - ln(1 + L/a)} ® ½(L/a)2, and
E = i(kQ/a2) .
At a great distance from the wire, the wire produces a field like that of a point charge.

First, the wire has a uniform linear charge density λ = Q/L. Next, we consider a small portion of the wire, dx, located at a distance x from the left end of the wire having charge dq. These infinitesimals are related by
dq = λdx = (Q/L)dx .
Assuming that the charge on the wire is positive, the electric field at r points away from dq. Using Coulomb's Law, dE is given by
dE = kdq r/r3 .
Here r = &endash;ix + ja and r = (x2 + a2)½. Thus
dE = [&endash;ix + ja] (kQ/L)dx/[x2 + a2]3/2 .
Integrating over the entire length of the wire, we get the
total
electric field to be
| E | = ∫-½L½L dE |
| = (kQ/L) {-i∫-½L½L dx x/[a2 + x2]3/2 + j∫-½L½L dx a/[a2 + x2]3/2} | |
| = (kQ/L){0 + j x / a[a2+x2]½ |-½L½L } | |
| = j (kQ/L){½L / a[a2+¼L2]½ - (-½L) / a[a2+¼L2]½} | |
| = j (kQ/L){2L / a[4a2+L2]½} | |
| = j (2kQ / La){1 / [1+4(a/L)2]½} |
In the limit L >> a, 1 / [1+4(a/L)2]½® 1, and
E = j(2kQ/La) = j(2kλ/a) .
Note that there is no i component to the electric field as can be seen from the symmetry of the problem.

First, each wire has a uniform linear charge density λ = Q/L. Next, we consider a small portion of one wire, dx, located at a distance x from the midpoint of the two wires having charge dq. These infinitesimals are related by
dq = λdx = (Q/L)dx .
Assuming that the charge on the wire is positive, the electric field at r points away from dq. Using Coulomb's Law, dE is given by
dE = kdq r/r3 .
Here r = &endash;ix + jh and r = (x2 + h2)½. Thus
dE = [&endash;ix + jh](kQ/L)dx/[h2 + x2]3/2 .
The symmetry of the problem can help reduce the amount of
work we have to do. First the i
components from each wire cancel,
so we need only consider the j
contributions. Second the j
contributions must be the same. As a result we need only integrate over
the length of would wire and double the result. We find that the total
electric field is
| E | = 2∫½aL+½a dEy |
| = j (2kQ/L) { ∫½aL+½a h/[h2 + x2]3/2 } | |
| = j (2kQ/L){ x / h[h2+x2]½ |½aL+½a } | |
| = j (2kQ/L){(L+½a) / h[h2+(L+½a)2]½ - (½a) / h[h2+¼a2]½} |
In the limit h >> L and h >> a, (L+½a) / h[h2+(L+½a)2]½&endash; (½a) / h[h2+¼a2]½® L/h2, and
E = i(2kQ/h2) .
This is same result as from a single point of charge 2Q.

By symmetry, if the electric field due to the bottom half of the wire is EB = iEx + jEy, then the electric field due to the vertical half of the wire is EV = iEy + jEx , i.e. the components flip, and the net electric field would be ENet = i(Ex + Ey) + j(Ex + Ey). So we need only find the electric field due to the bottom wire to write an expression for the next electric field.

We choose a coordinate system with the bottom wire on the x-axis with the origin at the left side. A tiny piece of the wire dq is chosen at an arbitrary point. The variable of integration is x, and we find dq = λdx, where λ is the linear charge density. The vector from the charge to the field point P is r = i(L – x) + jL, and the magnitude of the vector is r = [(L – x)2 + L2]½. The limits of integration are from x = 0 to x = L.
The formula for the electric field due to the bottom wire is thus
EB = ∫ kdq r/r3 = ∫0L kλ dx [i(L – x) + jL]/ [(L – x)2 + L2]3/2
We immediately can write the electric field due to the vertical wire
EV = ∫ kdq r/r3 = ∫0L kλ dx [iL + j(L – x)]/ [(L – x)2 + L2]3/2
The net electric field is thus
ENet = EB + EV = ∫0L kλ dx [–ix – jx]/ [(L – x)2 + L2]3/2

We consider a small portion of the wire, dS, located at an angle θ, having charge dq. These infinitesimals are related by
dq = λdS = λRdθ .
Assuming that the charge on the wire is positive, the electric field at P points away from dq. Using Coulomb's Law, dE is given by
dE = kdq r/r
Here r = –iRcos(θ) – jRsin(θ) and r = R. Thus
dE = [–iRcos(θ) – jRsin(θ]kλRdθ/R3 = [–icos(θ) – jsin(θ)] kλdθ/R .
Integrating over the entire angular length of the wire, we get the total electric field to be
| E | = ∫0π dE |
| = -(kλ/R) { i ∫0πcos(θ)dθ + j ∫0πsin(θ)dθ } | |
| = -(kλ/R){ isin(θ)|0π – jcos(θ)|0π } | |
| = -(kλ/R){0 – 2j} | |
| = -j(2kλ/R) |
Of course, we could have used the symmetry of the problem to predict that the i component had to be zero.

We choose a coordinate system with the origin of the x-axis at the centre of curvature. A tiny piece of the wire dq is chosen at an arbitrary point. The variable of integration is θ, and we find dq = λ ds = λb dθ where λ is the linear charge density. The vector from the charge to the field point P is r = i(a – b cosθ) – jbsinθ and the magnitude of the vector is r = [(a – bcosθ)2 + (bsinθ)2]½ = [a2 – 2abcosθ + b2]½. The limits of integration are from θ = –½π to x = ½π.
The formula for the electric field due to the wire is thus
EB = ∫ kdq r/r3 = ∫–½π½π kλ dθ [i(a – bcosθ) – j bsinθ] / [a2 – 2abcosθ + b2]3/2
![]() |
![]() |
The electric field from the positive half or the arc will point at 45° below the –x-axis which means it will have equal components in the –i and –j directions (see above left). The electric field from the negative half or the arc will point at 45° below the +x-axis which means it will have equal components in the +i and –j directions. For the entire arc, we will be left with just a term that points in the –j direction. We will work with the positive part of arc and use the symmetry identified to get our final answer (see above right)
We choose a coordinate system with the origin of the x-axis at the centre of curvature. A tiny piece of the wire dq is chosen at an arbitrary point. The variable of integration is θ , and we find dq = λds = λ b dθ where λ is the linear charge density. The vector from the charge to the field point is r = –ibcosθ – j bsinθ and the magnitude of the vector is r = b. The limits of integration are from θ = 0 to x = ½π
The formula for the electric field due to the positive portion of the wire is thus
E+ = ∫ kdq r/r3 = ∫0½π kλ b dθ [–i bcosθ – j bsinθ] / b2 = k λ∫0½πdθ [–i cos θ – j sinθ] .
As noted, the symmetry of the problem indicates that the electric field due to the negative portion of the wire is
E– = kλ ∫0½π dθ [+i cosθ – j sinθ] .
The net field is thus
ENet = – j 2kλ ∫0½π dθ sinθ = – j 2kλ .

The magnitude of the electric field from each wire is the
same
and is directed as shown in the diagram. The net electric field will
clearly be downwards, the i
contributions will cancel. Using trigonometry, the centre point is
distance x = ½Ltan(30°)
= L / 2Ö3 from
each wire.
Using the result of Question 2,
The total electric field is
(a) The charge contained is Q = A.
(b) A diagram let's us see why the net field is only in the i directions. Consider identical small pieces of charge which are diametrically opposed and the electric field each produces at x = ±a.

If the pieces have the same charge, the electric fields
they
produce will have the same magnitude. Looking at the above diagram, we
see that the j components will
cancel.
(c) From part (b) we have seen that the E is in the ±i direction. Therefore no fields pass through the sides of the pillbox as shown in the diagram below.

(d) By symmetry, the electric fields must have the same magnitude on either side of the plate, E(-a) = E(a).
(e)Gauss' Law states that the total flux of the electric field through all sides of the pillbox is equal to the enclosed charge divided by ε0, or
where n is the
outward-looking normal on each side
of the surface. From part (a) we know Qenclosed
= A. The
pillbox has two ends and one side, so that the integral has three parts
Examining the diagram below, we see that E
• nside
= 0 since the vectors are at right angles. Similarly, E
• nleft
= E • nright
= E since the vectors are
parallel.

Thus equation (1) reduces to
Since E is constant at the ends, it was taken out side the
integral. The integral itself then reduces to the surface area of the
end of the pillbox,
Hence the field due to an infinitely large plate is E = Σ / 2ε0. This result is good for real plates if one is much closer to the plate than the diameter of the plate.
(a) Symmetry indicates that the electric field only has an i component and no j component. This means that Gauss' Law,
reduces to
(b) The electric field at x = 0 is zero since the charge
is
distributed symmetrically about the y-axis. The electric field from a
piece of charge on one side will exactly cancel with the field from a
piece of charge on the other side.
(c) We need to find the charge inside the pillbox shown in
the
diagram below.

The charge inside is given by
Thus Gauss' Law yields,
Thus the electric field is
(d) We need to find the charge inside the pillbox shown in
the
diagram below.

The charge inside is given by
since the charge is confined to -½d £ x £ ½d.
Thus Gauss' Law yields,
Thus the electric field is E(a) = ρ0d / 2ε0 .
(e) The electric field as a function of a looks like


The amount of flux that passes through the cylinder is given by
Examining the diagram above, we see that E
• nside
= E(a) since the vectors are parallel. Similarly, E
• nleft
= E • nright
= 0 since the vectors are
at right angles. So there is no flux through the ends of the "gaussian
cylinder".
(b) Only a length L of the wire is inside the "gaussian
cylinder", so Qenclosed = λL
.
(c) Gauss' Law states that the total flux of the electric field through all sides of the pillbox is equal to the enclosed charge divided by ε0, or
where n is the
outward-looking normal on each side
of the surface. From parts (a) and (b), we know that this reduces to
Since E(a) is a constant for a given radius a, it may be
taken
outside the integral,
and we are left with an integral for the surface area of
the
side of the "gaussian cylinder" which is A = 2πaL.
Thus we have
Solving for the electric field yields
For cases of cylindrical symmetry, Gauss' Law
reduces to the much simpler
where a is the radius of the "gaussian cylinder" and L is
its
length.
(a) We draw an end view of the shell and "gaussian
cylinder".

We see that there is no charge inside the "gaussian
cylinder",
so Qenclosed = 0.
(b) Thus we find that the electric field for a < R
is 0. There is no electric inside the shell.
(c) Considering the case of a > R, we have the
following
diagram.

The "gaussian cylinder" encircles a length L of the shell,
so Qenclosed
= Σ2πRL.
(d) Thus Gauss' Law reduces to
and hence the electric field is
for a > R.
(e) The electric field as a function of a looks like

Note the jump in the electric field at the shell.
(a) The charge is arranged symmetrically about the centre,
so
the electric field from a piece of charge on one side is cancelled by
the electric field from the diametrically opposed piece of charge on
the other side. Thus the electric field is zero at the centre.
(b) We sketch the problem

The "gaussian sphere" contains only a portion of the total
charge given by
(c) Gauss' Law is stated
where n is the outward looking normal. For cases of spherical symmetry, as we have here, E and n are parallel and E • n = E(a). The electric field at the surface, E(a), is a constant because of the spherical charge distribution and may be taken outside the integral. We determined Qenclosed in part (b), thus we have
The integral is simply the surface area of the "gaussian
sphere", hence we have
Thus the electric field is
for 0 £
a £
R.
(d) We sketch the "gaussian sphere" and see that it
contains the
entire sphere therefore Qenclosed = Q.

(e) Gauss' Law reduces to
and the electric field is
for a ³
R.
(f) The electric field looks like

(a) First we sketch the "gaussian sphere" in each case.

(i) Here we see that there is no charge inside the
"gaussian
sphere", so Qenclosed = 0.
(ii) Here there is only a portion of the total charge inside the "gaussian sphere" given by the ratio of volumes

(iii) Here the entire shell is enclosed, so Qenclosed
= Q.
(b) In cases of spherical symmetry, Gauss' Law
reduces to
For our three cases, we have
(i) For a £ R,
Thus E(a) = 0.
(ii) For R £
a £ 2R,
Thus E(a) = (Q/4pe0R3)(a3-R3)/(7a2).
(iii) For a £ 2R,
Thus E(a) = Q/4pe0a2.
(c) The electric field looks like


For cases of spherical symmetry, Gauss' Law
reduces to
Here we have two cases as shown in the diagram below: (i)
0 £ a £ R and
(ii) a ³ R.

(i) For 0 £
a £ R, Qenclosed
= 0. Hence the
electric field is zero.
(ii) For a ³ R, the total shell is enclosed so Qenclosed = Q. We are not given Q but rather the charge density so
Thus Gauss' Law is
Hence the electric field is
Thus the electric field looks like

As long as the charge distribution is symmetrical, we can find the electric field from Gauss' Law. Gauss' Law says that E(a) depends only on the total charge enclosed and thus is independent of how that charge is distributed throughout the material. Hence we cannot distinguish between a sphere with all its charge on the surface and a sphere with the charge smeared throughout the sphere.

We have spherical symmetry so we use spherical Gaussian surfaces with the same centre. There are three different regions.

In the first region, 0 ≤ r < R, nothing is enclosed. So Qenclosed = 0 and thus E = 0.
In the second region, R < r < 2R, only the innermost shell and its charge are enclosed. So Qenclosed = Q. For spherical symmetry Gauss's Law is E4πr2 = Qenclosed/ε0. So E = Q/4ε0r2.
In the third region, r > 2R, both shells are enclosed. So Qenclosed = Q + –Q = 0 and thus E = 0.
The electric field of E vs r looks like the graph below. The values on the y-axis are found by setting r = R and r = 2R in the equation for E in the region R < r < 2R. Note the jumps because of the surface charges (i.e. shells).

Surface charge density is defined σ = Q/A. The surface area of a sphere is 4πr2. Thus the charge on the inner shell is Q1 = σ4πR2 and the charge on the outer shell is Q2 = –σ4π(2R)2 = –σ16πR2 = –4Q1.
/p>
As in the previous problem, we have spherical symmetry so we use spherical Gaussian surfaces with the same centre. There are the same three regions.
In the first region, 0 ≤ r < R, nothing is enclosed. So Qenclosed = 0 and thus E = 0.
In the second region, R < r < 2R, only the innermost shell and its charge are enclosed. So Qenclosed = Q1. For spherical symmetry Gauss's Law is E4πr2 = Qenclosed/e0. So E = σ4πR2/4πε0r2 or E = σR2/ε0r2
In the third region, r > 2R, both shells are enclosed. So Qenclosed = Q1 + Q2 = –3Q1 and thus E = 3σ4πR2/4πε0r2 or E = –3σR2/ε0r2.
The electric field of E vs r looks like the graph below. The values on the y-axis are found by setting r = R and r = 2R in the equation for E in the region R < r < 2R and r = 2R for the field in the outermost region. Note the jumps because of the surface charges (i.e. shells).


A linear charge density is λ = Q/L so Q1 = λL for the inner core and Q2 = –λL for the outer shell. The charge density and hence the field is cylindrical so we use a Gaussian cylinder of length L with a common centre with the object. Looking end on, we have three regions.
/p>
In the first region, 0 ≤ r < R, only part of the core is enclosed. We find out by noting that Qenclosed = Q1 × Venclosed/V1 = λL(πr2L/πR2L) = λLr2/R2. For cylindrical symmetry, E2πrL = Qenclosed/ε0. So E = λLr2/R2 / ε02πrL = λr/2πε0R2.
In the second region, R < r < 2R, the core is enclosed so Qenclosed = Q1 = λL. For cylindrical symmetry, E2πrL = Qenclosed/e0. So E = λL / ε02πrL = λ/2πε0r.
In the third region, r > 2R, both the core and the outer shell are enclosed. Thus Qenclosed = Q1 + Q2 = λL + –λL = 0. So E = 0.
To graph the electric field appropriately, note the value of E at the boundaries of each region. Note the kink where the solid ends and the drop at the shell.


The charge on area A of the positive plate is Q+ = σA while the negative plate has charge Q– = –σA.
The symmetry is planar so we use a Gaussian pillbox of end area A centered on the plates. There are only two ways to do this.

In the first region, 0 ≤ x < d, only part of the centre plate is enclosed and Qenclosed = Q– = –σA. For planar symmetry, Gauss`s Law reduces to E(2A) = Qenclosed/e0. So E = –σ/2ε0.
In the second region, x > d, part of all three plates are enclosed and Qenclosed = Q+ + Q– + Q+ = σA. So E(2A) = Qenclosed/ε0 yields E = σ/2ε0.
The electric field graph looks like:

If the charge densities were σ, 2σ, and 3σ, we could not use Gauss`s Law directly because the electric field would not be symmetric. E would be different at each end of the pillbox.
Despite this we could use Gauss`s Law if we recall that the net electric field is the sum of the individual fields and they have the required planar symmetry. So find the field for each plate separately, then add carefully.
We have several concepts that allow us to solve this sort of question.

The original +5Q must be on the exterior of the spherical shell as picture left above. We draw a Gaussian surface just inside the conducting shell that now contains the charge (see above middle). The flux through this surface must be zero since the electric field inside a conductor is zero. The flux is zero only if the enclosed charge is zero. We certainly have –2Q inside so +2Q must have been induced on the interior surface. Where did the +2Q come from? It came from the exterior surface, which leaves +3Q on the exterior surface. See the above picture on the right for the final charge distribution.

We have several concepts that allow us to solve this sort of question.
The shapes of the conductors do not matter. When the –2Q charge is placed in the box, a charge +2Q is induced on the interior surface of the box to keep the field in the box zero. Since the box was neutral that means there has to be –2Q on the exterior surface of the box to compensate. When the charge and box are placed in the cylinder, a charge of +2Q is induced on the interior surface of the cylinder to keep the electric field in the conducting shell of the cylinder zero. Since the cylinder originally had a net charge of +2Q, all the exterior charge moved to the interior surface leaving no charge on the exterior surface. The results are summarized in the drawing below.

Questions? mike.coombes@kwantlen.ca