| Questions: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
(b) E = (2/y)j. Calculate ΔV between y = 2 m and y = 5 m.
The potential difference between two points is defined as
ΔV = −∫ifE · dl ,
where dl is the parallel to the path of integration. The potential difference is independent of the path taken, so one may choose whichever path makes the integration easiest.
(i) We will integrate along the line joining the two points so that dl = idx.
| ΔV | = −∫ifE · dl |
| = −∫04 5x2i · i dx | |
| = −∫04 5x2dx | |
| = −(5/3) x3 |04 | |
| = −320/3 Volts |
Therefore V(x=4) is at a lower potential than V(x=0).
(b) We will integrate along the line joining the two points so that dl = jdy.
| ΔV | = −∫ifE · dl |
| = −∫25 (2/y) j · j dy | |
| = −∫25 2dy / y | |
| = −2 ln(y) |25 | |
| = −2 ln(5/2) Volts |
Therefore V(y=5) is at a lower potential than V(y=2).
First let's sketch the field and note the area we are looking for
The potential difference between two points is defined as
ΔV = V(A) – V(B) = –∫if E•dl ,
where dl is the parallel to the path of integration. Since the electric field coordinate system has x lying in the i direction, and since we are moving out in the same direction, E•dl = E i•idx = Edx.
|
ΔV |
= –∫if E•dl |
|
V(.75) – V(.25) |
= –∫0.250.75 Edx |
|
|
= – ∫0.250.75 (1000 V/m) dx |
|
|
= –(1000 V/m) x |0.250.75 |
|
|
= –(1000 V/m) (0.50 mm) |
|
|
= –0.50 V |
Note that the potential difference is just the negative of the area under the E versus x graph. Finding that area is very simple in this case, ΔV = – 1000 V/m × (0.75 – 0.50) mm = –0.50 V.
Since the electric field is positive to the right, the positive charge is at the origin so x = 0.25 mm is at higher potential.
(a) What is V(b)
– V(a)?
(b) What is V(b)
– V(c)?
(c) Find point(s) d
so that the V(d)
– V(c)
= +50.0 Volts.

(a)
We want the negative of the area from
a (1 m) to b (3m). From the graph this is +2 blocks or –50
Volts. Since V(b) = V(a) – 50 V, V(b) is at lower
potential.
(b)
We want the negative of the area from
c (4.5 m) to b (3m). Since we are moving backwards, this is equivalent
to the positive area from 3 m to 4.5 m, +5 blocks or +125
Volts. Since V(b) = V(c) + 125 V, V(b) is at higher potential.

We are given that the electric field is
E = E(r)r = (λ/2πε0r)r ,
where r is the unit radial vector pointing outward from the wire.
The potential difference between two points is defined as
ΔV = V(A) − V(B) = −∫ABE · dl ,
where dl is the parallel to the path of integration. Since the electric field is radial, the dot product picks out portion of dl which is parallel to r.
| V | = −∫ABE · dl |
| = −∫AB E dr | |
| = −(λ/2πε0) ∫12 dr/r | |
| = −(2kλ) ln(r) |12 | |
| = −(2kλ) ln(2) | |
| = −2(8.99 × 109 N−m2/C2)(1 × 10−6 C/m) ln(2) | |
| = −1.2463 × 104 Volts |
The minus sign indicates that point V(B) is smaller than V(A) or that point B at a lower potential than point A (i.e. farther from the positive charge). Therefore a negative particle released from rest at point B will accelerate towards point A (high potential). Using conservation of energy
½m(vA)2 − ½m(vB)2 = qΔV .
Since vB = 0, solving for vA yields
| vA | = [2qV/m]½ |
| = [2(−1.602 × 10−19 C)(−1.2463 × 104 V)/(9.11 × 10−31 kg)]½ | |
| = 6.6 × 107 m/s |
The charge will be moving at 6.6 × 107 m/s when it reaches point A.

We are given that the electric field is
E = E i = (σ/2ε0)i ,
where i is the unit vector pointing outward from the plane.
The potential difference between two points is defined as
ΔV = V(A) − V(B) = −∫ifE · dl ,
where dl is the parallel to the path of integration. Since the electric field only has an i component, the dot product picks out portion of dl which is parallel to i.
| V | = −∫ifE · dl |
| = −∫AB E dx | |
| = −(σ/2ε0) ∫12 dx | |
| = −(2kσ) x |12 | |
| = −2kσ | |
| = −2(8.99 × 109 N−m2/C2)(1 × 10−6 C/m2) | |
| = −5.6486 × 104 Volts |
The minus sign indicates that point A is at a lower potential than point B. Therefore a negative particle released from rest at point A will accelerate towards point B. Using conservation of energy
½m(vB)2 − ½m(va)2 = qΔV .
Since vB = 0, solving for vA yields
| vA | = [2qV/m]½ |
| = [2(−1.602 × 10−19 C)(−5.6486 × 104 V)/(9.11 × 10−31 kg)]½ | |
| = 1.4 × 108 m/s |
If started from rest, an electron will be moving at 1.4 × 108 m/s when it reaches point A. This is almost half the speed of light!
(a) Let's first sketch the field due to each plate. The electric field for the positive plate is shown by the dashed red lines leaving the plate. The electric field for the negative plate is shown by the solid green red lines entering the plate.

As can be seen, there are an equal number of solid and dashed lines. Outside the plates, the dashed and solid lines are anti−parallel and thus cancel. Between the plates, both sets of lines point in the same direction and thus add. To be more formal, we can make use of Gauss' Law,
∫E · ndA = Qenclosed/ε0 ,
where n is the outward−looking normal on each side of the surface. The pillbox has two ends and one side, so that the integral has three parts
∫E · ndA = ∫leftE · nleft dA + ∫sideE · nsidedA + ∫rightE · nrightdA .
By symmetry the field on either side is horizontal, with no lines crossing the sides of the "gaussian pillbox". Thus E · nside = 0 and the integral for the side of the pillbox vanishes. Symmetry also demands that if the electric field is not zero it must be equal and opposite on either side of the capacitor. Thus E · nleft = E · nright = Eoutside. Hence the integrals reduce to
∫leftE · nleft dA + ∫sideE · nsidedA + ∫rightE · nrightdA = 2Eoutside∫dA .
The integral over the area is just the area of the end of the pillbox, A. So Gauss's law is
2EoutsideA = Qenclosed/ε0 .
Since the plate have equal and opposite charges, we know Qenclosed = 0. Hence Eoutside = 0 as we would expect from the diagram.
(b) The potential difference between the two points xfinal = d and xinitial = 0 is defined as
ΔV = −∫ifE · dl,
where dl is the parallel to the path of integration. The potential difference is independent of the path taken, so one may choose whichever path makes the integration easiest. We will integrate along the line joining the two points so that dl = ida, where i is the unit vector in the x direction. As argued in part (a), the electric field between the plate is
Ebetween = σ/2ε0 + σ/2ε0 = σ/ε0 .
Hence we find the potential difference to be
V(r) = −∫ifE · dl = −∫0d Ebetween i · i da = −Ebetween∫0d da = −Ebetweend = −σd/ε0 .
So the potential difference between the plates is directly proportional to the separation d of the plates. The minus sign indicates that the negative plate is at a lower potential than the positive plate which is what we would expect.

The potentialdifference between the two points A and B is defined as
VB – VA = –∫AB E•dl ,
where dl is the parallel to the path of integration. The potential difference is independent of the path taken, so one may choose whichever path makes the integration easiest. If we take A as the point closer to the origin than B, then dl = i dx and then E•dl. = E dx.
VB – VA = –∫AB E dx
Setting A at zero, and noting V(0) = 0, we have
VB = –∫0B E dx .
There are three distinct regions (see diagram above) where B could be. We need to do the above integral for each case. Note that the integrals may be piecewise.
Region 1: 0 < B < d
We want the area under the graph from 0 to B where B is < d. Looking at the graph of E vs x, clearly this integral will be zero and thus VB = 0.
Region 2: d < B < 2d
We want the area under the E vs x graph from 0 to B where B is less than 2d.

We will need to break the integral into pieces
VB = –∫0B E dx = –∫0d E dx + –òdB E dx = 0 – E0(b – d) = – E0(B – d).
Region 3: 2d < B
We want the area under the E vs x graph from 0 to B where B is greater than 2D.

We will need to break the integral into pieces
VB = –∫0B E dx = –∫0d E dx + –∫d2d E dx + –<∫2dB E dx = 0 – E0(2d – d) – 0 = – E0d.
Since point B can be any value of x, the potential looks like

Just like the previous question
VB – VA = –∫AB E dx
However, here we set B to infinity, and note V(∞) = 0, so that we get
–VA = –∫A∞ E dx .
We will drop the minus signs from each side. There are three distinct regions (see diagram above) where A could be. We need to do the above integral for each case. Note that the integrals may be piecewise.
Region 1: 0 < A < d
We want the area under the graph from A to ∞ where A is < d. Looking at the graph of E vs x, clearly this integral include the entire area under the graph. The area is clearly E0d but we will to break the integral into pieces.

VA = ∫A∞ E dx = ∫Ad E dx +– ∫d2d E dx + ∫2d∞ E dx = 0 + E0(2d – d) + 0 = E0d.
Region 2: d < B < 2d
We want the area under the E vs x graph from A to ∞ where A is less than 2d. We will need to break the integral into pieces.

VA = ∫ A¥ E dx = ∫A2d E dx + ∫2d∞ E dx = E0(2d – A) + 0 = E0(2d – A).
Region 3: 2d < B
Clearly in this region VA = 0 since A is past 2d.
Since point A can be any value of x, the potential looks like

The difference is that this graph is shifted upwards. Note that the difference in potential between any two points will be exactly the same as the previous question.

The potential difference between the two points A and B is defined as
VB – VA = – ∫AB E dx,
where we have used E•dl = Edx. Setting A to be at zero and taking VA = 0, we have
VB = –∫0BE dx .
Since the electric field is symmetric, E(–x) = E(x), for this problem, then V(–x) = V(x). Thus we only need to evaluate V(x) for two regions.
(i) For 0 ≤ B ≤ ½d
|
VB |
= –∫0B E dx |
|
|
= –∫0B (ρ0/ε 0) x dx |
|
|
= –(ρ0/ε0) ∫0B x dx |
|
|
= –( ρ0 /ε 0) ½x2 |0B |
|
|
= –( ρ0 B2 / 2 ε 0) |
(i) For B ≥ ½d
|
VB |
= – ∫0 B E(a)da |
|
|
= –{ ∫0 ½d ( ρ0 /ε 0) x dx + ∫½d B ( ρ0 d/2ε 0) dx } |
|
|
= –( ρ0 /ε 0) ∫0 ½d x dx – ( ρ0 d/2ε 0) ∫½d B dx |
|
|
= –( ρ0 /ε 0) ½x2 |0½d – (ρ 0d/2 ε0 ) x |½dB |
|
|
= –( ρ0 d2 / 8 ε 0) – ( ρ0 d/2ε 0)(B – ½d) |
|
|
= –( ρ0 d/2ε 0)(B – ¼d) |
Since B can be any value of x, the potential looks like
AB
Note that V(x) = 0 at x = 0, which is consistent with our assumption that V(0) = 0.
The potential difference between the two points B = r and A = 1 is defined as
ΔV = V(r) − V(1) = −∫AB E · dl ,
where dl is the parallel to the path of integration. The potential difference is independent of the path taken, so one may choose whichever path makes the integration easiest. We will integrate along the line joining the two points so that dl = rda, where r is the unit radial vector. Setting V(1) = 0, we have
V(r) = −∫AB E · dl = −∫1r E r · r dr = −∫1r E dr .
Evaluating V(r), we find
| V(r) | = −∫1r E dr |
| = −∫1r (λ/2ε0r) dr | |
| = −(λ/2ε0) ∫1r dr/r | |
| = −(λ/2ε0) ln(r) |1r | |
| = −(λ/2ε0) ln(r) |
Note that V(r) is negative for r > 1 and positive for r < 1. The potential looks like

Also note that V(r=1) = 0 consistent with our initial assumption.

where the field is radial (i.e. in the r direction). Determine V(r) relative to V(r = 0) where r is the distance from the centre of the cylinder. Assume V(0) = 0. Plot V as a function of r.
The potential difference between the two points B = r and A = 0 is defined as
ΔV = V(r) − V(0) = −∫AB E · dl ,
where dl is the parallel to the path of integration. The potential difference is independent of the path taken, so one may choose whichever path makes the integration easiest. We will integrate along the line joining the two points so that dl = rda, where r is the unit radial vector. Setting V(0) = 0, we have
V(r) = −∫AB E · dl = −∫0r E r · r dr = −∫0r E dr .
Since E has two regions, we need to evaluate V(r) separately for each region.
(i) For 0 ≤ r ≤ R
| V(r) | = −∫0r E dr |
| = −∫0r (0) dr | |
| = 0 |
(ii) For r ≥ R
| V(r) | = −∫0r E dr |
| = −∫0r E dr − ∫Rr E dr | |
| = −∫0r (0) da − ∫Rr (σR/ε0) dr/r | |
| = 0 − (σR/ε0) ln(r) |Rr | |
| = − (σR/ε0) ln(r/R) |
The potential looks like

Note that V(r=1) = 0 consistent with our initial assumption.

where the field is radial (i.e. in the r direction). Determine V(r) relative to V(∞) where r is the distance from the centre of the sphere. Assume V(r=∞) = 0. Plot V as a function of r.
The potential difference between the two points A = r and B = ∞ is defined as
ΔV = V(∞) − V(r) = −∫AB E · dl ,
where dl is the parallel to the path of integration. The potential difference is independent of the path taken, so one may choose whichever path makes the integration easiest. We will integrate along the line joining the two points so that dl = rd, where r is the unit radial vector. Setting V(∞) = 0, we have
−V(r) = −∫AB E · dl = −∫r∞ E r · r dr = −∫r∞ E dr .
We can drop the minus sign from each side. Since E has two regions, we need to evaluate V(r) separately for each region.
(i) For 0 ≤ r ≤ R
| V(r) | = ∫r∞ E dr |
| = ∫rR E dr + ∫R∞ E dr | |
| = ∫rR (Q/4πε0R3) rdr + ∫R∞ (Q/4πε0) dr/r2 | |
| = (Q/4πε0R3) ½r2 |rR − (Q/4πε0) 1/r |R∞ | |
| = (Q/8πε0R3)×(R2 − r2) + Q/4πε0R | |
| = 3Q/8πε0R − Qr2/8πε0R2 |
(ii) For r ≥ R
| V(r) | = ∫r∞E dr |
| = ∫r∞ (Q/4πε0) dr/r2 | |
| = −(Q/4πε0) 1/r |r∞ | |
| = Q/4πε0r |
The potential looks like

Note that V(r=∞) = 0, consistent with our initial assumption.

where the field is radial (i.e. in the r direction). Determine V(r) relative to V(∞)where r is the distance from the centre of the sphere. Assume V(∞) = 0. Plot V as a function of r.
The potential difference between the two points A = r and B = ∞ is defined as
ΔV = V(∞) − V(r) = −∫AB E · dl ,
where dl is the parallel to the path of integration. The potential difference is independent of the path taken, so one may choose whichever path makes the integration easiest. We will integrate along the line joining the two points so that dl = rdr, where r is the unit radial vector. Setting V(∞) = 0, we have
−V(r) = −∫AB E · dl = −∫r∞ E r · r dr = −∫r∞ E dr .
We drop the minus side from both sides. Since E has three regions, we need to evaluate V(r) separately for each region.
(i) For 0 ≤ r ≤ R
| V(r) | = ∫r∞ E dr |
| = ∫rR E dr + ∫R2R E dr + ∫2R∞ E dr | |
| = ∫rR 0 dr + ∫R2R (Qr/28πε0R3−Q/28πε0r2) dr + ∫2R∞ (Q/4πε0) dr/r2 | |
| = {(Q/28πε0R3) ½r2 + (Q/28πε0) 1/r }| R2R − (Q/4πε0) 1/r |2R∞ | |
| = {(Q/560R3)(4R2 − R2) + (Q/28πε0)(1/2R − 1/R)} + Q/8πε0R | |
| = (9/14)( Q/4πε0R ) |
(ii) For R ≤ r ≤ 2R
| V(r) | = ∫∞r E dr |
| = ∫r2R E dr + ∫2R∞ E dr | |
| = ∫r2R (Qr/28πε0R3−Q/28πε0r2) dr + ∫2R∞ (Q/4πε0) dr/r2 | |
| = {(Q/28πε0R3) ½r2 + (Q/28πε0) 1/r }| r2R − (Q/4πε0) 1/r |2R∞ | |
| = {(Q/560R3)(4R2 − r2) + (Q/28πε0)(1/2R − 1/r)} + Q/8πε0R | |
| = (12/14)( Q/4πε0R) − (1/14)(Qr2/4πε0R3) − (2/14)(Q/4πε0r) |
(iii) For r ≥ 2R
| V(r) | =∫∞r E dr |
| = ∫r∞ (Q/4πε0) dr/r2 | |
| = −(Q/4πε0) 1/r |r∞ | |
| = Q/4πε0r |
The potential looks like

Note that V(r=∞) = 0, consistent with our initial assumption.

where the field is radial (i.e. in the r direction). Determine V(r) relative to V(r=∞) where r is the distance from the centre of the sphere. Assume V(r=∞) = 0. Plot V as a function of r.
The potential difference between the two points A = r and B = ∞ is defined as
ΔV = V(∞) − V(r) = −∫AB E · dl ,
where dl is the parallel to the path of integration. The potential difference is independent of the path taken, so one may choose whichever path makes the integration easiest. We will integrate along the line joining the two points so that dl = rdr, where r is the unit radial vector. Setting V(∞) = 0, we have
−V(r) = −∫AB E · dl = −∫r∞ E r · r dr = −∫r∞ E dr .
We will drop the minus sign from both sides. Since E has two regions, we need to evaluate V(r) separately for each region.
(i) For 0 ≤ r ≤ R
| V(r) | = ∫r∞ E dr |
| = ∫rR E dr + ∫R∞ E dr | |
| = ∫rR 0 dr + ∫R∞(σR2/ε0) dr/r2 | |
| = −(σR2/ε0) 1/r |R∞ | |
| = σR/ε0 |
(ii) For r ≥ R
| V(r) | = ∫r∞ E dr |
| = ∫r∞ (σR2/ε0) dr/r2 | |
| = −(σR2/ε0) 1/r |r∞ | |
| = σR2 / ε0r |
The potential looks like

Note that V(r=∞) = 0, consistent with our initial assumption.

Points A and B are at different electrostatic potentials because of the arrangement of the charges. A positive charge will speed up if it moves from high potential to low or slow down if it moves from low potential to high. It does this because a high potential area has relatively more positive charge in the area than the low potential area and a positive charge is thus repelled.
So to find vB, we find determine the potential at A and B. The potential at point A is given by the two fixed point charges and is equal to the sum of the potential of each charge
| VA | = kq1/L + kq2/2L |
| = (8.99 × 109 N−m2/C2)[(3 × 10−6C)/(0.25 m) + (3 × 10−6C)/(0.50 m)] | |
| = 1.798 × 105 Volts |
Similarly the potential at point B is
| VB | = kq1/2L + kq2/L |
| = (8.99 × 109 N−m2/C2)[(3 × 10−6C)/(0.50 m) + (3 × 10−6C)/(0.25 m)] | |
| = 1.978 × 105 Volts |
Using Conservation of Energy,
½m(vB)2 − ½m(vA)2 = q(VA − VB) .
Solving for vB, we find
| vB | = [(vA)2 + 2q(VA − VB)/m]½ |
| = [(2.50 m/s)2 + 2(1.00 × 10−6 C)(1.798105 − 1.978105 Volts)/(0.015 kg]½ | |
| = 2.25 m/s |
The electrostatic potential of a charge configuration is given by the formula

The charges in the diagrams below have been numbered and various value of rij have been shown.
(a)
| U = | K(Q)(−Q)/L + K(Q)(Q)/2L +
K(Q)(−Q)/3L + K(Q)(Q)/4L +
K(Q)(−Q)/5L +
K(−Q)(Q)/L + K(−Q)(−Q)/2L + K(−Q)(Q)/3L + K(−Q)(−Q)/4L + K(Q)(−Q)/L + K(Q)(Q)/2L + K(Q)(−Q)/3L + K(−Q)(Q)/L + K(−Q)(−Q)/2L + K(Q)(−Q)/L |
| = | −(35/12) KQ2/L |
(b)
| U = | K(Q)(−Q)/L + K(Q)(Q)/2L + K(Q)(Q)/3L +
K(Q)(Q)/4L +
K(Q)(−Q)/5L +
K(−Q)(Q)/L + K(−Q)(Q)/2L + K(−Q)(Q)/3L + K(−Q)(−Q)/4L + K(Q)(Q)/L + K(Q)(Q)/2L + K(Q)(−Q)/3L + K(Q)(Q)/L + K(Q)(−Q)/2L + K(Q)(−Q)/L |
| = | +(3/4) KQ2/L |
In case (a) net energy was gained in assembling the charges while work had to be done to assemble the charges in (b). If left free to move, the charges in (a) would collapse in on themselves and would explode away from each other in (b).

We consider a small portion of the wire, dS, located at an angle θ, having charge dq. These infinitesimals are related by
dq = λdS = Rdθ .
The electrostatic potential is a scalar given by
dV = kdq/R = kλdθ .
Integrating over the entire angular length of the wire, we get the total potential to be
| ΔV | = ∫0π dV |
| = (λk) ∫0π dθ | |
| = (πλk) |
Note that the potential at the centre of the arc is independent of the radius of the arc. As well, since the potential of a point charge is set to be zero at r = #163;, and we built the arc out of point charge infinitesimals, this potential is also relative to infinity.

First, the wire has a uniform linear charge density = Q/L. Next, we consider a small portion of the wire, dx, located at a distance x from the left end of the wire having charge dq. These infinitesimals are related by
dq = dx = (Q/L)dx .
The electrostatic potential is a scalar given by
dV = kdq/r = k(Q/L)dx/r .
Before we can integrate, we need to find r in terms of x and y. Using trigonometry,
r = [y2 + x2]½ .
Hence
dV = (kQ/L)dx/[y2 + x2]½ .
Integrating over the entire length of the wire, we get the total potential to be
| ΔV | = ∫−½L½L dV |
| = (kQ/L) ∫−½L½L dx / [a2 + x2]½ | |
| = (kQ/L) ln|x + [y2+x2]½| |−½L½L } | |
| = (kQ/L) ln|(½L + [y2+¼L2]½)/(−½L + [y2+¼L2]½)| |
The electric field along the y−axis is given by
Ey = −j∂V /∂y = +j(KQ/y)[y2+¼L2]−½ .
This is the same result as question 2 in the Gauss' Law handout.

First we use trigonometry to find y in terms of L, y = L / 2tan(30°) = L / 2√3.
The potential of the triangle is the sum of the potentials due to its sides
|
|
= V1 + V2 + V3 |
| = (K/L)(Q + Q + −Q) ln|(½L + [y2+¼L2]½)/(−½L + [y2+¼L2]½)| | |
| = (KQ/L) ln|(L/2 + [L2/12+L2/4]½)/(−L/2 + [L2/12+L2+/4]½)| | |
| = (kQ/L) ln| (2 + √3) / (2 − √3)| |
The electric field is given by the negative gradient of the electrostatic potential
| E | = −∇V |
| = −i∂V /∂x + −j∂V/∂y + −k∂V/∂z | |
| = −i(6xy − 4z) + −j(3x2 − 10y) + −k(−4x) |
At (1,0,2) the electric field is
E = 8i − 3 j + 4k.
The electric field is given by the negative gradient of the electrostatic potential
| E | = −∇V |
| = −i∂V/∂x + −j∂V/∂y + −k∂V/∂z | |
| = −i(5 − 6xy) + − j(−3x2 + 2z2) + −k(4yz) |
At (1,0,−2) the electric field is
E = −5i − 5j .
Questions? mike.coombes@kwantlen.ca